Processing math: 1%

Thursday, April 24, 2014

Modules in combinatorics

Consider (the totally disconnected groupoid Perm of permutations of sets),
which (considered as a category) is a subcategory of (the category \Set): \quad \Perm \subset \Set.
Recall that any category, say \calC, is a left-right bimodule over itself, via its hom bifunctor: \smash{ \quad \calC\op \times \calC \xrightarrow{\textstyle \hom - \calC -} \Set }\;.
In particular (the category \Set) is a left-right bimodule over itself: (\functionf,\functiong,\functionh) \mapsto \functionf\functiong\functionh.
By restriction of scalars, \Set is a bimodule over (its groupoid subcategory \Perm): \smash{ \quad \Perm\op\times\Perm \xrightarrow{\textstyle \hom - \Set -} \Set \; : \; (\sigma, \tau) \mapsto ( \hom \sigma \Set \tau \; : \; \functionf \mapsto \sigma \functionf \tau ) } \;.
(Analogy: In algebra, any ring is a left-right bimodule (Wikipedia, nLab) over each of its subrings.)

Take the left, right, and left-right quotients of \Set by \Perm.
This yields [(the first four parts) of (the "twelvefold way")] .

Now consider the subcategories of surjections, \boxed\Surj, and, of injections, \boxed\Inj, of the category \Set.
Each is closed under both left and right actions of \Perm, thus is a sub-\Perm-bimodule.
Applying the same (quotient by \Perm) constructions to (those two submodules) gives [(the other eight parts) of (the twelvefold way)].

We can present the twelvefold way as a table:

The Twelvefold Way
Module,
with scalars
Module,
without scalars
Left Quotient
indistinguishable
balls
Right Quotient
indistinguishable
boxes
Left-Right Quotient
indistinguishable
balls and boxes
(\Perm, \Set) \Set \Perm\backslash\Set \Set/\Perm \Perm\backslash\Set/\Perm
(\Perm, \Surj) \Surj \Perm\backslash\Surj \Surj/\Perm \Perm\backslash\Surj/\Perm
(\Perm, \Inj) \Inj \Perm\backslash\Inj \Inj/\Perm \Perm\backslash\Inj/\Perm


Consider the intersection of the submodules \Surj and \Inj, the groupoid \smash{\boxed\Bij} of bijections of sets
(which of course contains \Perm as a subgroupoid: \Perm \subset \Bij \subset \Surj,\Inj \subset \Set).
Given any three equipotent sets, say \setX, \setY, and \setZ,
consider commutative triangles in \Bij with those fixed sets as vertices.
Fixing one side of such a triangle to a specific (internal) bijection
sets up (an external bijection between the possible fill-ins for the other two sides).
Thus, for example, choosing (an internal bijection from \setX to \setY)
sets up (an external bijection from \hom \setY \Set \setZ to \hom \setX \Set \setZ),
which restricts to (an external bijection from \hom \setY \Bij \setZ to \hom \setX \Bij \setZ).

If we have an arbitrary finite set \setY, of size n,
let \setX = \mathbf n, the canonical linear order of size n.
Then

choosing a particular linear ordering of \setY (a specific element of \hom {\mathbf n} \Bij \setY) sets up
an external bijection from {permutations of \setY (\hom \setY \Perm \setY = \hom \setY \Bij \setY)} to {linear orders on \setY (\hom {\mathbf n} \Bij \setY)},

a result which is frequently used, e.g., rather extensively in Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics.


References
[CKVW] Carboni, A.; Kelly, G. M.; Verity, D.; Wood, R. J. (1998). "A 2-Categorical Approach To Change Of Base And Geometric Morphisms II". Theory and Applications of Categories. 4 (5): 82–136.

No comments:

Post a Comment

MathJax 2.7.9