Consider (the totally disconnected groupoid $\boxed\Perm$ of permutations of sets),
which (considered as a category) is a subcategory of (the category $\Set$): $\quad \Perm \subset \Set$.
Recall that any category, say $\calC$, is a left-right bimodule over itself, via its hom bifunctor: $\smash{ \quad \calC\op \times \calC \xrightarrow{\textstyle \hom - \calC -} \Set }\;$.
In particular (the category $\Set$) is a left-right bimodule over itself: $(\functionf,\functiong,\functionh) \mapsto \functionf\functiong\functionh$.
By restriction of scalars, $\Set$ is a bimodule over (its groupoid subcategory $\Perm$): $\smash{ \quad \Perm\op\times\Perm \xrightarrow{\textstyle \hom - \Set -} \Set \; : \; (\sigma, \tau) \mapsto ( \hom \sigma \Set \tau \; : \; \functionf \mapsto \sigma \functionf \tau ) } \;$.
(Analogy: In algebra, any ring is a left-right bimodule (Wikipedia, nLab) over each of its subrings.)
Take the left, right, and left-right quotients of $\Set$ by $\Perm$.
This yields [(the first four parts) of (the "twelvefold way")]
.
Now consider the subcategories of surjections, $\boxed\Surj$, and, of injections, $\boxed\Inj$, of the category $\Set$.
Each is closed under both left and right actions of $\Perm$, thus is a sub-$\Perm$-bimodule.
Applying the same (quotient by $\Perm$) constructions to (those two submodules) gives [(the other eight parts) of (the twelvefold way)].
We can present the twelvefold way as a table:
Module, with scalars | Module, without scalars | Left Quotient indistinguishable balls | Right Quotient indistinguishable boxes | Left-Right Quotient indistinguishable balls and boxes |
---|---|---|---|---|
$(\Perm, \Set)$ | $\Set$ | $\Perm\backslash\Set$ | $\Set/\Perm$ | $\Perm\backslash\Set/\Perm$ |
$(\Perm, \Surj)$ | $\Surj$ | $\Perm\backslash\Surj$ | $\Surj/\Perm$ | $\Perm\backslash\Surj/\Perm$ |
$(\Perm, \Inj)$ | $\Inj$ | $\Perm\backslash\Inj$ | $\Inj/\Perm$ | $\Perm\backslash\Inj/\Perm$ |
Consider the intersection of the submodules $\Surj$ and $\Inj$, the groupoid $\smash{\boxed\Bij}$ of bijections of sets
(which of course contains $\Perm$ as a subgroupoid: $\Perm \subset \Bij \subset \Surj,\Inj \subset \Set$).
Given any three equipotent sets, say $\setX$, $\setY$, and $\setZ$,
consider commutative triangles in $\Bij$ with those fixed sets as vertices.
Fixing one side of such a triangle to a specific (internal) bijection
sets up (an external bijection between the possible fill-ins for the other two sides).
Thus, for example, choosing (an internal bijection from $\setX$ to $\setY$)
sets up (an external bijection from $\hom \setY \Set \setZ$ to $\hom \setX \Set \setZ$),
which restricts to (an external bijection from $\hom \setY \Bij \setZ$ to $\hom \setX \Bij \setZ$).
If we have an arbitrary finite set $\setY$, of size $n$,
let $\setX = \mathbf n$, the canonical linear order of size $n$.
Then
an external bijection from {permutations of $\setY$ ($\hom \setY \Perm \setY = \hom \setY \Bij \setY$)} to {linear orders on $\setY$ ($\hom {\mathbf n} \Bij \setY$)},
a result which is frequently used, e.g., rather extensively in Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics.
No comments:
Post a Comment