Consider (the totally disconnected groupoid Perm of permutations of sets),
which (considered as a category) is a subcategory of (the category \Set): \quad \Perm \subset \Set.
Recall that any category, say \calC, is a left-right bimodule over itself, via its hom bifunctor: \smash{ \quad \calC\op \times \calC \xrightarrow{\textstyle \hom - \calC -} \Set }\;.
In particular (the category \Set) is a left-right bimodule over itself: (\functionf,\functiong,\functionh) \mapsto \functionf\functiong\functionh.
By restriction of scalars, \Set is a bimodule over (its groupoid subcategory \Perm): \smash{ \quad \Perm\op\times\Perm \xrightarrow{\textstyle \hom - \Set -} \Set \; : \; (\sigma, \tau) \mapsto ( \hom \sigma \Set \tau \; : \; \functionf \mapsto \sigma \functionf \tau ) } \;.
(Analogy: In algebra, any ring is a left-right bimodule (Wikipedia, nLab) over each of its subrings.)
Take the left, right, and left-right quotients of \Set by \Perm.
This yields [(the first four parts) of (the "twelvefold way")]
.
Now consider the subcategories of surjections, \boxed\Surj, and, of injections, \boxed\Inj, of the category \Set.
Each is closed under both left and right actions of \Perm, thus is a sub-\Perm-bimodule.
Applying the same (quotient by \Perm) constructions to (those two submodules) gives [(the other eight parts) of (the twelvefold way)].
We can present the twelvefold way as a table:
Module, with scalars | Module, without scalars | Left Quotient indistinguishable balls | Right Quotient indistinguishable boxes | Left-Right Quotient indistinguishable balls and boxes |
---|---|---|---|---|
(\Perm, \Set) | \Set | \Perm\backslash\Set | \Set/\Perm | \Perm\backslash\Set/\Perm |
(\Perm, \Surj) | \Surj | \Perm\backslash\Surj | \Surj/\Perm | \Perm\backslash\Surj/\Perm |
(\Perm, \Inj) | \Inj | \Perm\backslash\Inj | \Inj/\Perm | \Perm\backslash\Inj/\Perm |
Consider the intersection of the submodules \Surj and \Inj, the groupoid \smash{\boxed\Bij} of bijections of sets
(which of course contains \Perm as a subgroupoid: \Perm \subset \Bij \subset \Surj,\Inj \subset \Set).
Given any three equipotent sets, say \setX, \setY, and \setZ,
consider commutative triangles in \Bij with those fixed sets as vertices.
Fixing one side of such a triangle to a specific (internal) bijection
sets up (an external bijection between the possible fill-ins for the other two sides).
Thus, for example, choosing (an internal bijection from \setX to \setY)
sets up (an external bijection from \hom \setY \Set \setZ to \hom \setX \Set \setZ),
which restricts to (an external bijection from \hom \setY \Bij \setZ to \hom \setX \Bij \setZ).
If we have an arbitrary finite set \setY, of size n,
let \setX = \mathbf n, the canonical linear order of size n.
Then
an external bijection from {permutations of \setY (\hom \setY \Perm \setY = \hom \setY \Bij \setY)} to {linear orders on \setY (\hom {\mathbf n} \Bij \setY)},
a result which is frequently used, e.g., rather extensively in Stanley, Enumerative Combinatorics.
No comments:
Post a Comment